
ActiveSG have been rated very poorly on Play Store and App Store. Our team redesigned it with an aim to provide a more pleasant experience for user to book ActiveSG facilities. In addition to enhancing the visual outlook of the interfaces, we also introduced new features to provide ease of logging in, efficient searching of products, and navigation to cart.


The Double Diamond Design Process Model was used to help our team to have a common understanding towards our goals and also as a means of effective communication. Besides, it represents a process of exploring ActiveSG's issues more widely and deeply with divergent thinking, and then taking focused action through convergent thinking.
01
02
03
The findings that were garnered from the Discover stage informed our User Persona as well as the Customer Journey Map to develop a clear understanding of target users as well as keeping the team aligned and focused on issues that mattered.
With the use of the 3 Competitive Analysis methodologies: Task Analysis, Pluses & Deltas, and Feature Inventory, as well as using Comparative Analysis, we compared and looked for gaps to fine-tune ActiveSG’s Unique Selling Points (USP); and here are some takeaways from this analysis:
As ActiveSG is not lacking in its feature inventory, refinement in existing features is necessary to keep up with its competitors and users' expectations, specifically towards the 2 features as shown below:
Submitting feedback forms
Access to facility rates
With overwhelming insights garnered from the Discovery phase, on top of our time and logistical limitations, Feature Prioritization was used to plan out the order of priorities to be worked on.
Brainstorming with the team helped us come up with a variety of ideas. We started with Hand Sketches to quickly visualize concepts and ideas for the redesign. We then rolled out our low-fidelity re-design based on the research findings.


Focus was placed on the main navigation of the platform but many users were confused by the different currencies in ActiveSG instead!
A Quantitative Research method was deemed suitable to solve the issue of the naming of the credits that we had identified from the Usability Tests. A Survey was conducted using Google Forms.
The current cash account (the amount you top up into) is called MyCash. Which new name should be given for better clarity?
The current free $100 credits (given by Government) is called ActiveSG$. Which new name should be given for better clarity?

